When people think of penetration testing, they often imagine a world of improvisation—hackers following their instincts, chasing with only obsession, and uncovering GRC's secrets through sheer and limited intuition. But beneath the surface, the most effective penetration testing is really built on foundational understanding, which we call "structure". Structure, it is what transforms to put our intelligence to use, hopefully to apply it. Enough to ensure things are tight before a vulnerability can slip.
The Structured Approach and Key Phases
Preparation - Planning and Scoping
Clear boundaries and objectives are set when testing is the plan ahead. To keep in mind, sometimes, what systems are in scope, as what do they want me hacking? What methods are allowed or do they really want me hacking on this territory? Eventually, you start to notice WHY they're hiring hackers~ if you look in-depth. ⬇️
Normally, people are dominating the research campaign, you are providing a service. This is to ensure everyone is on the same page and that the test is ethical and legal. Just like asking permission on a first date. It's not a fairy tale people!
Information Gathering - Reconnaissance
Testers collect much information for research testing and as possible about the target—its technologies, public data, and potential entry points. Utilizing proven methods in checklists to ensure nothing is missed and everything is protected, as far as theories soon to be applied almost. Which, in my case, theories are often applied AFTER reconnaissance to save some time as I read from "Anatomy of a breakthrough" by Adam Atler. He's a cool guy, I believe.
Note Taking - Enumeration and Mapping
Testers systematically identify all the parts of the system: endpoints, user roles, and data flows. This structured mapping helps reveal the “attack surface”—the places where vulnerabilities might hide. They repeat this cycle from the CyberSecurity Framework, to develop a matter of consistency for knowing. And this NIST have more information on this as well.
Looking In-depth - Vulnerability Analysis
Using both automated tools +and manual techniques, testers look for weaknesses or structure imbalances. We could use top ten OWASP to be checked, because in IT, it is ancient knowledge. It's why it's called "IT Researcher" in HackerOne. Which I was inspired and motivated by watching NahamSec's videos on YT, he's a cool legit hacker, check him out.
Structure weakness - Exploitation
Here, testers carefully attempt to exploit discovered vulnerabilities to understand their real-world impact. The blueprint or structure or way of penetrating testing is crucial to avoid causing unintended harm, so detailed records of what was tested and how. Then after testing, any changes made during exploitation are reversed. Structure ensures the system is left as it was found, and that no traces or risks remain. Which is what's called Post-Exploitation and Cleanup.
Reporting
The final phase is about communication. Testers organize their findings into a clear, actionable report. Structure helps make complex technical issues understandable, and provides prioritized recommendations for fixing them.
Structure as a Mindset
Conclusion
Just as this article is told, structure CAN be and is a mindset. It means to approach all with learning, and apprehending. Allowing creativity to flourish within safe boundaries, in penetration testing into a reliable science. Which science is just a fancy word for "observation". OKAY, enough said! Stay tuned for more! And spread the word, that's the CTA here folks. "Have a nice day!"
Also this may be the source, here's my YT video... Tell me what you think about it.. I'm not sure what to do.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comment section